In this week’s issue, we explore a transformative trend in urban development within Los Angeles—a city traditionally dominated by car culture. We’re examining the significant shift toward building projects with little to no parking, spurred by legislative changes (including ED1 and AB2097) and evolving urban needs.

Redefining Urban Space: The Case of Reduced Parking

A notable example is a development adjacent to downtown Los Angeles. Originally approved in 2018, this 122-unit mixed-use project included plans for two floors of subterranean parking, offering 86 spaces. However, with the enforcement of AB2097—a state mandate prohibiting parking minimums near major transit stops—the project’s scope changed dramatically. Now, the development will include only 14 at-grade parking spaces, eliminating the costly subterranean component and the swimming pool, but expanding the rooftop deck. This modification not only reshapes the physical layout of the project but also suggests substantial cost savings, potentially around $6.5M to $7M.

Understanding AB2097

AB2097 represents a bold step towards reducing our reliance on vehicles. By eliminating parking minimums within a half-mile of significant transit facilities, this legislation aims to encourage public transport usage, decrease traffic congestion, and support more sustainable urban growth.

Economic and Design Implications

The financial implications of reducing or eliminating parking are profound. Developers can redirect funds from expensive parking infrastructure to other aspects of their projects—enhancing amenities or reducing overall construction costs. This shift makes projects more financially viable on paper, but I think the reality translates into more money spent over the long term.

Counterpoints: Potential Challenges and Economic Effects

While there are undeniable benefits to reducing parking in urban developments, the potential challenges in a car-dependent city like Los Angeles are significant and multifaceted. First and foremost, a substantial reduction in available parking could lead to lower rents and higher tenant turnover. Tenants with cars may prefer buildings that offer more convenient parking options and choose not to renew leases, seeking accommodations that better suit their transportation needs. Furthermore, the sales market for buildings without adequate parking also presents difficulties. Prospective buyers, recognizing the dependency on cars in Los Angeles, are likely to underwrite these properties with a higher vacancy factor and lower anticipated rents. This underwriting approach can narrow the pool of potential buyers and reduce the asset’s market value, making it challenging to achieve top dollar upon sale.

Additionally, neighborhood congestion may increase as residents resort to street parking & strain local infrastructure. For residents, particularly those with specific needs such as families, the elderly, or disabled individuals, the lack of parking can significantly impact their quality of life by limiting mobility and accessibility. Emergency response times could also be adversely affected in critical situations due to congested streets or complicated access. Overall, these dynamics could jeopardize the stability and long-term profitability of developments with minimal parking, underscoring the need for a balanced approach in urban planning that considers the unique characteristics and needs of the local population.

The Bigger Picture: Social and Environmental Impact

The move towards minimal parking facilities aligns with broader social and environmental goals. Environmentally, it supports reduced carbon emissions and promotes a smaller urban footprint. Socially, it can lead to more vibrant, accessible communities where public transport and pedestrian pathways take precedence over car traffic.

The City has a Part to Play

To effectively support developments with minimal or no parking, Los Angeles must implement comprehensive and strategic initiatives. Enhancing public transit infrastructure is crucial; this means investing in more reliable, frequent, and extensive bus and train services that connect residents with key urban areas. Promoting alternative modes of transportation, such as biking and walking, through expanded bike lanes and pedestrian zones can also reduce car dependency. The city should focus on transit-oriented developments that integrate living, working, and recreational spaces near transit hubs to make public transport a more viable option. Additionally, facilitating car-sharing and ride-sharing services, alongside revising zoning regulations to allow higher densities near these hubs, can further reduce the need for personal vehicles. Engaging with communities and providing incentives for developers to include sustainable and accessible features in their projects are also vital steps. By implementing these measures, Los Angeles can create a more sustainable, accessible, and efficient urban environment, even as we move away from traditional car-centric planning.

Looking Ahead: Urban Development in LA and Beyond

As we continue to observe the effects of AB2097 and similar policies, it’s clear that the landscape of urban development is evolving. How we adapt to and embrace these changes will be crucial for shaping the future of Los Angeles and other metropolitan areas.

Don’t Forget

We provide entitlement & permitting services for all projects in Southern California. We’re also a full service General Contractor. Keep us in mind for any future projects!