California’s housing crisis has been escalating for years. Skyrocketing rents, shrinking affordable options, and a backlog of development approvals have made building new housing a complicated and often frustrating process. When Mr. Thompson, a small developer in Los Angeles, came to us, he described the struggle perfectly:

“I thought I had everything lined up,” he said. “Site plans, contractor, financing—I was ready. But the city kept pushing back. They changed rules mid-review, asked for new designs, and my timeline kept slipping. I had no idea what I was supposed to prepare first. It felt like the system was working against me.”

This is exactly what SB 330 was designed to address. Passed in 2019 as the Housing Crisis Act, the law aims to streamline the permitting process, protect existing housing, and give developers and communities a clearer path forward. In this blog, we’ll break down how SB 330 works, its practical implications, and why it is both praised and criticized in the real estate world.

What Is SB 330?

SB 330, officially known as the Housing Crisis Act of 2019, went into effect on January 1, 2020. Its main goal is simple: speed up housing production while protecting existing housing stock.

At its core, SB 330:

  • Limits local governments’ ability to impose new restrictions once a project is in the approval pipeline.

  • Protects tenants in existing units by requiring replacement housing if demolitions occur.

  • Streamlines permitting and review timelines, giving developers more predictability.

Although originally set to expire on January 1, 2025, many provisions have since been extended or made permanent.

Why SB 330 Matters: The Big Picture

The law is not just bureaucracy—it’s a strategic attempt to solve a statewide housing crisis. Here’s why it matters:

Senate Bill 330 (SB 330)

1. Streamlined Permitting

Before SB 330, developers often spent months navigating shifting rules and requirements. SB 330 allows for a “preliminary application”, which locks in:

  • Fees at the time of submission

  • Zoning and development standards

  • Design requirements that cannot be changed mid-review

This reduces the risk of sudden rule changes, saving developers time, money, and legal headaches.

2. Protecting Existing Housing

One of the most impactful aspects of SB 330 is “no net loss” protection. If a development demolishes existing housing, it must:

  • Replace all units lost

  • Maintain unit size and income category for protected units

  • Provide tenants relocation assistance and possibly the right to return

This ensures new developments don’t worsen the housing crisis by displacing existing residents.

3. Limiting Local Regulatory Power

Cities can no longer arbitrarily introduce:

  • New moratoria on housing

  • Caps on housing permits

  • Subjective design standards that could block projects

Additionally, the law limits public hearings to five per project, including appeals, preventing endless delays.

4. Faster, More Predictable Review

SB 330 sets tight deadlines for local agencies, including projects requiring environmental review. Developers gain predictability: fees, rules, and timelines are locked in, reducing project uncertainty and financing risk.

How SB 330 Works in Practice

Understanding SB 330’s provisions in theory is one thing; applying it to real projects is another. Here’s how it works on the ground.

Preliminary Application & Vesting

The preliminary application is submitted with basic information:

  • Site plan

  • Project description

  • Basic drawings

By submitting this early and paying required fees, developers vest current rules and fees, meaning local governments cannot apply new restrictions or fees that arise after submission.

Limits on Local Regulatory Actions

SB 330 prevents cities from:

  • Downzoning: Cannot reduce allowable residential density after application submission

  • Imposing new moratoria aimed at restricting housing growth

  • Adding non-objective design standards that were not in effect at the time of the preliminary application

These measures reduce the risk of political or bureaucratic interference mid-project.

Housing Protection

SB 330 requires:

Requirement Details
No net loss Must replace demolished units
Protected units Same size/income class as original units
Tenant rights Temporary relocation, return rights, relocation assistance

This ensures that projects contribute positively to housing stock without displacing existing residents.

Review Timelines

The law enforces stricter timelines:

  • Local governments must act quickly once the full application is submitted

  • Environmental review timelines (CEQA) are shortened where applicable

  • Reduced rounds of corrections speed up overall approval

Who Qualifies for SB 330 Protections?

SB 330 applies to housing development projects, including:

  • Purely residential projects (2+ units)

  • Mixed-use projects with at least two-thirds residential square footage

  • Transitional or supportive housing

Some exceptions exist, including high fire hazard zones or other restricted areas.

Pros and Criticisms of SB 330

Advantages

  • Predictability: Developers can lock in rules and fees early

  • Efficiency: Streamlined review and fewer hearings speed up construction

  • Tenant protection: Replacement and relocation requirements preserve housing

  • Regulatory restraint: Reduces arbitrary or politically motivated obstacles

Criticisms

  • Reduced local control: Communities have less say in design and zoning changes

  • Design quality concerns: Limiting new design standards could affect aesthetics

  • Displacement risk: Demolitions, even with protections, may temporarily disrupt tenants

  • Temporary nature: Original expiration caused uncertainty, though many provisions are now extended

Real-World Impacts

Consider a mid-sized developer planning a 50-unit apartment project in Los Angeles:

  • Without SB 330: They could face six months of rule changes, multiple public hearings, and fee increases mid-review.

  • With SB 330: Preliminary application locks in fees, design, and zoning. Only five hearings are allowed, and demolition of existing units requires in-kind replacement.

This translates into faster approvals, reduced legal risk, and a more predictable budget.

Why Developers Should Care

SB 330 is not just legislation—it’s a strategic tool:

  • Lock in zoning and fees early

  • Reduce uncertainty during permitting

  • Plan with confidence knowing tenant protections and demolition rules are clear

  • Use SB 330 to protect investment and avoid lengthy bureaucratic delays

Why Local Governments Should Care

Cities and counties must:

  • Process applications efficiently

  • Limit hearings to five per project

  • Enforce “no net loss” and protected unit requirements

  • Adapt planning processes to comply with SB 330 timelines

Failure to comply can slow projects and potentially create legal challenges.

Key Takeaways

  1. SB 330 streamlines housing development while protecting tenants.

  2. Developers gain predictability by vesting current rules and fees.

  3. Cities must comply with tighter review timelines and limited hearings.

  4. Replacement requirements prevent net housing loss.

  5. Provisions originally temporary are now extended or permanent.

  6. Understanding SB 330 is critical for developers, investors, and planners navigating California’s housing landscape.

Opinion: Why SB 330 Is a Step Forward

From our perspective at JDJ Consulting, SB 330 represents a needed balance between developer predictability and housing preservation. While critics argue it limits local control, in practice it helps move projects forward, reduces wasted time, and ensures California gains housing stock without displacing residents. In a state where supply has not kept pace with demand, SB 330 is arguably one of the most important housing laws of the decade.

Gavel and model house on the table.

Conclusion

California’s housing crisis demands action. SB 330 provides developers with certainty and speed while protecting tenants and communities. For anyone involved in residential development—from small ADUs to large apartment complexes—understanding SB 330 is essential. With the right strategy, projects can proceed more efficiently, meet community needs, and comply with state law.

At JDJ Consulting, we help developers and property owners plan, prepare, and submit compliant housing projects under SB 330, ensuring smoother approvals and reduced risk.

Contact JDJ Consulting:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This will close in 0 seconds